Robotic Surgery in Africa: History, Contemporary, and Thereafter.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Robotic Surgery, History, Africa, Advantages, Limitations, Benefits
Abstract
Background: Since its introduction in the late 1980s, robotic surgery has become a less invasive procedure, offering advantages such as increased dexterity, mobility, 3D visualization, and reduced fatigue for surgeons. Although the procedure is still not widely used in Africa, it is fast growing and can potentially minimize surgical inequities in low- and middle-income nations. This narrative review aims to explore the advantages of robotic surgery, its history in Africa, the current level of application of this surgical technique in the continent, the limitations, and how the healthcare system in the region stands to benefit from its use in the future.
Methodology: In this narrative review, extensive literature research was conducted using the Google search engine and databases: ‘Google Scholar’, ‘Cochrane Library’, ‘PubMed’, ‘ScienceDirect’, and African Journals Online (AJOL), spanning 6 months. The search phrases used included: robotic surgery, robotic surgery in Africa, history of robotic surgery in Africa, robotic surgery in low- and middle-income countries, potential advantages of robotic surgery, robotic surgery limitations, benefits of robotic surgery, demerits of robotic surgery, artificial Intelligence in surgical care, and the future of robotic surgery.
A total of 405 articles were found. An advanced search that limited the search to titles revealed only 20 results. Two discussed the possibility of embracing robotic surgery in low- and middle-income countries, one talked about the potential benefits, challenges, and scope of robotic surgery in the future. Also, one talked about the origin of robotic surgery, one delved into artificial Intelligence and its role in surgical care, then discussed the roles of robotic surgery in surgical care, and the rest discussed the few recorded applications of robotic surgery in surgical care in Africa.
Results: Even though the concept of robotics in surgery dates back more than fifty years, its practical application began in the late 1980s. Its enormous potential notwithstanding, the application of robotic surgery on the African continent is still highly underwhelming.
Admittedly the utilization of robotic surgery in Africa faces many challenges such as the high cost of its acquisition, maintenance, and training needed to use the machine, the upskilling of surgeons to specialize in robotic surgery in each field of expertise, the need to alter the size and layout of pre-existing operating rooms to accommodate the components of the robots and to also increase patient load for the use of the robot to make it effective for the cost price, it can potentially reduce cost of healthcare, nosocomial infections, antibiotics abuse and surgical inequalities in the Mother Continent.
Conclusion: Our research showed that robotic surgery, despite offering multiple benefits and having the capability to lessen surgical inequalities in resource-poor nations, is still underutilized in the African continent. The study also showed that even though the utilization of robotic surgery faces challenges in middle and low-income parts of the world, like Africa, due to high costs, limited facilities, patient burden, and the need for specialized training. It, however, holds enormous potential in the continent, such as reductions of infections, antibiotic resistance, and hospital stays, and even possibly reduce the costs of healthcare.
References
2. George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A, Marescaux J, Satava RM. Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care. JSLS. 2018;22(4):e2018.00039.
3. Oyebamiji T. Robotic surgery in Nigeria: an uncertain possibility. International Surgery Journal. 2020 Oct 23;7:3876.
4. Reddy CL, Mitra S, Meara JG, Atun R, Afshar S. Artificial Intelligence and its role in surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Digital Health. 2019 Dec 1;1(8):e384–6.
5. First for Africa: Robotic-assisted cardiothoracic surgery comes to SA [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 23]. Available from: https://www.netcare.co.za/News-Hub/Articles/first-for-africa-robotic-assisted-cardiothoracic-surgery-comes-to-sa
6. Forgan T, Lazarus J. Embracing the future: the necessity of implementing robotic surgery in South African training institutions. S Afr J Surg. 2023 Jun;61(2):144–9.
7. Debakey Y, Zaghloul A, Farag A, Mahmoud A, Elattar I. Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Approach for Rectal Cancer Surgery, First Egyptian Academic Center Experience, RCT. Minimally Invasive Surgery [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Nov 16];2018. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5836562
8. Zaghloul AS, Mahmoud AM. Preliminary results of robotic colorectal surgery at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2016 Sep;28(3):169–74.
9. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):14–21.
10. Cleary K, Nguyen C. State of the Art in Surgical Robotics: Clinical Applications and Technology Challenges. Computer Aided Surgery. 2001 Jan 1;6(6):312–28.
11. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):14–21.
12. Ashrafian H, Clancy O, Grover V, Darzi A. The evolution of robotic surgery: surgical and anaesthetic aspects. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017 Dec 1;119(suppl_1):i72–84.
13. Catchpole KR, Hallett E, Curtis S, Mirchi T, Souders CP, Anger JT. Diagnosing barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery. Ergonomics. 2018 Jan 2;61(1):26–39.
14. Jara RD, Guerrón AD, Portenier D. Complications of Robotic Surgery. Surgical Clinics. 2020 Apr 1;100(2):461–8.
15. Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M. Trends in the use of robotic-assisted surgery during the COVID 19 pandemic. Br J Surg. 2021 Oct 23;108(10):e330–1.
16. Lam K, Clarke J, Purkayastha S, Kinross JM. Uptake and accessibility of surgical robotics in England. Int J Med Robot. 2021 Feb;17(1):1–7.
17. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016 Feb;25:75–8.
18. Holmer H, Lantz A, Kunjumen T, Finlayson S, Hoyler M, Siyam A, et al. Global distribution of surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and obstetricians. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Apr 27;3 Suppl 2:S9-11.
19. Okhawere KE, Shih IF, Lee SH, Li Y, Wong JA, Badani KK. Comparison of 1-Year Health Care Costs and Use Associated With Open vs Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212265.
20. Schmidt B, Leppert JT. Costs of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy 1 Year After Surgery: Pay Now and Save Later? JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212548.
