Caesarean Section Techniques among Senior Obstetricians in Nigeria: A Descriptive Multicentre Survey
Main Article Content
Keywords
Caesarean Section, Surgical Techniques, Obstetrician, Maternal Health
Abstract
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, yet considerable variation exists in operative techniques, particularly in low and middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to determine the common surgical techniques employed by senior obstetricians in Nigeria and evaluate the associations with demographic and institutional factors.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional multicentre online survey was conducted between May 2023 and May 2024 among practising Senior Registrars and Consultants in Obstetrics and Gynaecology across Nigeria. Using a structured, pretested questionnaire, data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative CS practices. Data were analysed using R statistical software, with descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses performed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: A total of 293 complete responses were analysed. The mean age of respondents was 42.1±7.6 years, with a mean work experience of 11.9±6.4 years; 66.6% were male, and 78.8% practiced in federal tertiary hospitals. The most commonly reported techniques included skin preparation with Savlon plus alcohol (73.4%), Pfannenstiel abdominal incision (71.0%), bladder flap creation (73%), controlled cord traction for placental delivery (68.9%), double-layer uterine closure (99%), visceral peritoneal closure (60%), and subcuticular skin closure (96.6%). Routine postoperative thromboprophylaxis was used by only 18.4% of respondents. Most surgical choices were not significantly associated with age, work experience, or place of practice, except for visceral peritoneal closure, which varied by institution (p = 0.043).
Conclusion: CS practices among obstetricians in Nigeria showed some consistency in key operative steps such as Pfannenstiel incision, double-layer uterine closure, and subcuticular skin closure, alongside notable variation in other aspects, particularly thromboprophylaxis use. These findings highlight the influence of institutional practice patterns and underscore the need for context-specific, evidence-based guidelines to harmonise CS techniques and optimise maternal outcomes nationwide.
References
Jombo S, Ossai C, Onwusulu D, Ilikannu S, Fagbemi A. Feto-maternal outcomes of caesarean delivery in Federal Medical Centre Asaba: a two-year review. Afr Health Sci. 2022;22(1):172–179. [https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v22i1.22](https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v22i1.22)
Dumont A, de Bernis L, Bouvier-Colle MH, Bréart G. Caesarean section rate for maternal indication in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;358(9290):1328–1333. [https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06414-5](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736%2801%2906414-5)
Pai M, Sundaram P, Radhakrishnan KK, Thomas K, Muliyil JP. A high rate of caesarean sections in an affluent section of Chennai: is it cause for concern? Natl Med J India. 1999;12(4):156–158.
The CAESAR study collaborative group. Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR). BJOG. 2010;117(11):1366–1376. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x)
Thomas J, Paranjothy S. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Press; 2001.
Berglundh S, Benova L, Olisaekee G, Hanson C. Caesarean section rate in Nigeria between 2013 and 2018 by obstetric risk and socio-economic status. Trop Med Int Health. 2021;26(7):775–788. [https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13579](https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13579)
Yaya S, Uthman OA, Amouzou A, Bishwajit G. Disparities in caesarean section prevalence and determinants across sub-Saharan African countries. Glob Health Res Policy. 2018;3:19. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-018-0074-y](https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-018-0074-y)
Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecological studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12:57. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6)
Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM for the WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2015;123(5):667–670. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13526](https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13526)
Moges A, Ademe BW, Akessa GM. Prevalence and outcome of caesarean section in Attat Hospital, Gurage Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia. Arch Med. 2015;7(4):8
Geidam AD, Audu BM, Kawuwa BM, Obed JY. Rising trend and indications of caesarean section at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2009;8(2):127–132. [https://doi.org/10.4103/1596-3519.56242](https://doi.org/10.4103/1596-3519.56242)
Buowari YD. Indications for caesarean section at a Nigerian District Hospital. Niger Health J. 2015;12(2):43
Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai M, Shah AN, Novikova N. Techniques for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD004662. [https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004662.pub2](https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004662.pub2)
Tully L, Gates S, Brocklehurst P, McKenzie-McHarg K, Ayers S. Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;102(2):120–126. [https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00589-9](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115%2801%2900589-9)
CORONIS Trial Collaborative Group. The CORONIS trial: international study of caesarean section surgical techniques. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7:24. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-24](https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-24)
Asah-Opoku K, Heesterman T, Zeevaert ML, et al. Cesarean section: one procedure, varied techniques. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2025;169(2):707–719. [https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16133](https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16133)
CORONIS Collaborative Group; Abalos E, Addo V, Brocklehurst P, El Sheikh M, Farrell B, Gray S, et al. Caesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): a fractional factorial randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):234–248. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60441-9](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2813%2960441-9)
The CORONIS Collaborative Group. Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3-year follow-up of the CORONIS trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10039):62–72. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00204-X](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2816%2900204-X)
Hofmeyr GJ, Novikova N, Mathai M, Shah A. Techniques for cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(5):431–444. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.018](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.018)
Anorlu RI, Maholwana B, Hofmeyr GJ. Methods of delivering the placenta at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD004737. [https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004737](https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004737)
Gudu W, Sisay ZT, Wondafrash M, Sium AF. Cesarean delivery surgical techniques in Africa: a survey study from Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(10):e0292382. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292382](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292382)
Agboghoroma CO, Gharoro EP. Coverage and distribution of obstetricians and gynecologists in Nigeria. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;129(1):50–53. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.09.034](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.09.034)
Raosoft Inc. Raosoft sample size calculator [Internet]. Seattle (WA): Raosoft Inc.; 2004. [http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html](http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html)
Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: CHERRIES. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34. [https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34](https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34)
Lyell DJ, Power M, Murtough K, et al. Surgical techniques at cesarean delivery: a US survey. Surg J (N Y). 2016;2(4):e119–e125. [https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594247](https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594247)
Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Balestreri D, et al. A randomized clinical trial of two surgical techniques for cesarean section. Am J Perinatol. 1998;15(10):589–594. [https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-994066](https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-994066)
Macones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):247.e1–247.e9
Bain E, Wilson A, Tooher R, Gates S, Davis LJ, Middleton P. Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic disease in pregnancy and the early postnatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(2):CD001689
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike License 4.0. This licence allows users to download and share, remix, tweak and build upon the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the original authorship is acknowledged and the new creations are licensed under identical terms.