Contemporary Strategies for Regenerating Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects Around Dental Implants: A Critical Review
Main Article Content
Keywords
Periodontal regeneration procedures, Dehiscence, Fenestration, Dental Implants, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF), Soft Tissue Augmentation, CAD/CAM
Abstract
Background: The long-term success of dental implants is intrinsically linked to the stability of surrounding peri-implant tissues. Dehiscence and fenestration defects represent significant clinical challenges that can compromise functional and aesthetic outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of modern strategies for managing these defects at implant sites.
Methodology: We evaluate defect etiology and classification while underscoring the necessity of 3D diagnostic tools like Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). The review critically examines Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) components, comparing resorbable and non-resorbable membranes alongside various bone grafting materials. Additionally, we explore the roles of biologics, soft tissue management, and digital CAD/CAM workflows.
Results: Analysis indicates that implants with corrected defects achieve survival rates comparable to those in pristine bone, reaching up to 97.2% for dehiscences over 10 years. Resorbable collagen membranes and slow-resorbing xenografts (DBBM) are the clinical standards for routine defects due to predictable volume maintenance. Biologics like PRF enhance graft handling, while rhBMP-2 provides potent osteoinduction for complex cases. Literature confirms that hard tissue regeneration must be paired with soft tissue augmentation—specifically connective tissue grafts to convert thin phenotypes into recession-resistant architecture.
Conclusion: Successful regeneration requires a holistic approach combining biological principles, meticulous soft tissue management, and digital precision to ensure long-term stability.
References
2.Albrektsson T et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-170.
3.Wang HL, Boyapati L. "PASS" principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 2006;15(1):8-17.
4.Brånemark PI et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132.
5.Buser D et al. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(6):839-851.
6.Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212-218.
7.Hämmerle CH, Jung RE, Feloutzis A. A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:226-231.
8.Sullivan DY, Placing and restoring implants in the aesthetic zone. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1994;6(7):85-94.
9.Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):286-291.
10.Mische CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. 2nd ed. Elsevier Mosby; 2015.
11.Fürhauser R et al. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(6):639-644.
12.Maló P et al. The 10-year outcomes of implants inserted with dehiscence or fenestrations in the rehabilitation of completely edentulous jaws with the All-on-4 concept. J Oral Implantol. 2022;48(2):137-147.
13.Spray JR et al. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol. 2000;5(1):119-128.
14.Januário AL et al. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(10):1168-1171.
15.Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215.
16.Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The effect of suturing on wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2009;30(6):342-348.
17.Linkevicius T et al. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(4):712-719.
18.Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, et al. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113(6):817-826.
19.Dahlin C et al. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81(5):672-676.
20.Schenk RK et al. Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9(1):13-29.
21.Elgali I et al. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017;125(5):315-337.
22.Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):203-215.
23.Proussaefs P, Lozada J. The use of a customized titanium mesh for the reconstruction of an atrophic edentulous mandible: a case report. J Oral Implantol. 2005;31(4):185-190.
24.Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7 Suppl 2:S219-234.
25.Nkenke E, Neukam FW. Autogenous bone harvesting and grafting in advanced jaw resorption: morbidity, resorption and implant survival. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7 Suppl 2:S203-217.
26.Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:218-236.
27.Dohan Ehrenfest DM et al. Three-dimensional architecture and cell composition of a Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin clot and membrane. J Periodontol. 2010;81(4):546-555.
28.Miron RJ et al. Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Its Application in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Narrative Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(4):831-841.
29.Castro AB et al. Regenerative potential of leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(2):195-204.
30.Boyne PJ et al. De novo bone induction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(12):1693-1707.
31.Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: an evidence-based approach to interpretation of the literature. Spine J. 2011;11(6):471-491.
32.Zucchelli G, Mounssif I. Periodontal plastic surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2015;68(1):333-368.
33.Thoma DS et al. Efficacy of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and in partially edentulous areas: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41 Suppl 15:S77-91.
34.Ciocca L et al. Digital workflow with open-source CAD-CAM software aimed to design a customized 3D laser-printed titanium mesh for guided bone regeneration. J Clin Med. 2020;9(10):3129.
35.Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:237-259.
