Embracing Computer Vision for Diagnostic Maxillofacial Imaging — An Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning (AIML)Pilot Project
Main Article Content
Keywords
Artificial intelligence AI, Machine Learning ML, Computer Vision, Maxillofacial Imaging, Diagnostic Efficiency
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, particularly in diagnostic medical imaging. For Nigerian Oral and Maxillofacial surgeons, embracing AI technologies is essential to improve diagnostic accuracy and maintain global relevance. This study aimed to demonstrate the potential of machine learning (ML) tools in enhancing diagnostic precision in maxillofacial radiology.
Methodology: A supervised learning model was developed using Google’s Teachable Machine, a no-code ML platform based on computer vision. Radiological images of histologically confirmed lesions were retrieved. Two projects were conducted: Project 1 trained the model to distinguish between malignant and benign bony jaw lesions using 46 radiographs (panoramic and sectional CT images). Project 2 trained the model to differentiate between craniofacial fibrous dysplasia and ossifying fibroma, using 40 radiographs. Each model was tested on five new images. The output probabilities were analyzed, and standard performance metrics—accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), and F1-score—were computed. Additionally, ROC-AUC (Receiver Operating Characteristic – Area Under the Curve) curves were generated using Python code on Google Colaboratory IDE.
Results: In Project 1, the model yielded predictive probabilities ranging from 89% to 100% for distinguishing malignant from benign lesions. In Project 2, it produced 71% to 100% probabilities for classifying fibrous dysplasia versus ossifying fibroma. Applying a 70% probability threshold for positive prediction, both models achieved perfect scores (1.0) across all performance metrics, including AUC = 1.00.
Conclusion: AI-driven computer vision models show strong potential for improving diagnostic workflows in maxillofacial imaging. Their application can support more efficient clinical decision-making. However, the use of small test samples may have resulted in overfitting. Future studies with larger datasets and increased AI literacy among clinicians are essential for real-world implementation in resource-limited settings.
References
2. Czakó L, Šufliarsky B, Šimko K, Soviš M, Vidova I, Lifková M, et al. Exploring the practical applications of artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning in maxillofacial surgery: a comprehensive analysis of published works [Preprint]. 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1758.v1
3. Najjar R. Redefining radiology: a review of artificial intelligence integration in medical imaging. Diagnostics [Internet]. 2023 Aug 25;13(17). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/17/2760/pdf?version=1692969539
4. Abdul NS, Shivakumar GC, Sangappa SB, Ravindranath V, Naik PN, Perumal SM, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in the field of oral and maxillofacial pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:122. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03533-7
5. Carney M, Webster B, Alvarado I, Phillips K, Howell N, Griffith J, et al. Teachable Machine: Approachable Web-Based Tool for Exploring Machine Learning Classification. Human Factors in Computing Systems 2020:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382839.
6. Salehi AW, Khan S, Gupta G, Alabduallah BI, Almjally A, Alsolai H, Siddiqui T, Mellit A. A Study of CNN and Transfer Learning in Medical Imaging: Advantages, Challenges, Future Scope. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7):5930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075930
7. Boutahir MK, Farhaoui Y, Azrour M. Machine learning and deep learning applications for solar radiation predictions review: Morocco as a case of study. In: Yaseen SG, editor. Digital economy, business analytics, and big data analytics applications. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 55–67. (Studies in Computational Intelligence; vol 1010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-05258-3_6
8. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2016 Jun 27–30; Las Vegas, NV, USA. IEEE; 2016. p. 770–8. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
9. TensorFlow. Make your own "Teachable Machine" using transfer learning with TensorFlow.js [Internet]. Google Codelabs. [cited 2025 May 19]. Available from: https://codelabs.developers.google.com/tensorflowjs-transfer-learning-teachable-machine
10. Johannes AZ, Bukit M, Betan AD, Tarigan J. Google Teachable Machine: pemanfaatan machine learning berbasis CNN untuk identifikasi cepat batuan mineral kalsit, kuarsa dan magnetit. Jurnal Komputer & Informatika. 2024;12(2):102–9. doi:10.35508/jicon.v12i2.15170
11. Chazar C, Rafsanjani MH. Penerapan Teachable Machine pada klasifikasi machine learning untuk identifikasi bibit tanaman. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Dan Adopsi Teknologi (INOTEK). 2022;2(1):32–40. doi:10.35969/inotek.v2i1.207
12. Prasad PY, Prasad D, Malleswari DN, Shetty MN, Gupta N. Implementation of Machine Learning Based Google Teachable Machine in Early Childhood Education n.d. https://doi.org/10.9756/int-jecse/v14i3.527.
13. Langlotz CP. Clinical translation of machine learning for medical imaging. Proc SPIE. 2024 Apr 3;12927:1292703. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3012610
14. Government AI Readiness Index 2023-Oxford insights. [cited February 2025] Available from:https://oxfordinsights.com/ai-readiness/ai-readiness-index/
15. Kwon O, Yong TH, Kang SR, Kim JE, Huh KH, Heo MS, et al. Automatic diagnosis for cysts and tumors of both jaws on panoramic radiographs using a deep convolution neural network. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Dec 1;49(8):20200185. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200185. Epub 2020 Jul 3. PMID: 32574113; PMCID: PMC7719862.
16. Luchini C, Pea A, Scarpa A. Artificial intelligence in oncology: current applications and future perspectives. Br J Cancer. 2022 Jan;126(1):4-9. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01633-1.
17. Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Lång K, Gubern-Merida A, Broeders M, Gennaro G, Clauser P, et al. Stand-alone artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: comparison with 101 radiologists. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep;111(9):916–22. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy222.
18. Poedjiastoeti W, Suebnukarn S. Application of convolutional neural network in the diagnosis of jaw tumors. Healthc Inform Res. 2018 Sep;24(3):236-41. doi: 10.4258/hir.2018.24.3.236.
19. Bajwa J, Munir U, Nori A, Williams B. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine. Future Healthc J. 2021 Jul;8(2):e188-94. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0095. PMID: 34286183; PMCID: PMC8285156.
20. Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z. PMID: 37740191; PMCID: PMC10517477.
21. Castelvecchi D. Can we open the black box of AI? Nature. 2016;538(7623):20–23. doi:10.1038/538020a
22. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D. Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Int J Comput Vis. 2020;128(2):336-59. doi: 10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7.
23. Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C. “Why should I trust you?”: explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 2016. p. 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778