Tongue print as a valuable biometric and forensic tool: A digital photographic study
Main Article Content
Keywords
Tongue, Gender identity, Health status, Diagnosis
Abstract
Background: Surface features present on the dorsal surface of the tongue along with colour and shape are unique characteristics of every individual. Tongue print is being considered as a new biometric and forensic authentication tool. This digital photographic study was conducted to analyze and compare morphological differences on the dorsal surface of the tongue which can serve as a valuable tool in forensic odontology.
Methodology: The present study utilized a digital photographic method. Patients who visited the outpatient department (OPD) of the dental institution for availing necessary dental treatment were included in the study. The final study sample comprised 316 subjects which were recruited by systematic random sampling. The shape, surface texture, colour etc. of the tongue were recorded. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. Significance was set at p≤0.05.
Results: The majority of the subjects (60.13%) had a ‘U-shaped’ tongue. ‘Tongue fissures/cracks’ and ‘Smooth Tongue’ were the two prominent surface textures present among 59.18% and 35.13% of the study subjects respectively. The shape and surface texture of the tongue were significantly associated with the gender of the study subjects. Non-visibility of median septum was found more among females than males. More than two-thirds of the subjects (77.51%) belonging to the age group of 18-30 years had pink-coloured tongues and the findings were highly significant (p=0.00).
Conclusion: In addition to rugoscopy and cheiloscopy, the study of lingual morphology may be one of the secure methods for identification in forensic dentistry.
References
2. Abraham J, Binita G, Sandra EJ. A morphological study of tongue and its role in forensic odontology. J Forensic Sci and Criminal Inves. 2018;7:1 5.
3. Rani L, Gheena S. Tongue prints in forensic odontology-a review. Int J Sci Dev Res. 2021;6:419-422
4. Radhika T, Jeddy N, Nithya S. Tongue prints: A novel biometric and potential forensic tool. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016; 8:117-9.
5. Anastasi JK, Currie LM, Kim GH. Understanding diagnostic reasoning in TCM practice: tongue diagnosis. Altern Ther Health Med. 2009;15:18-28.
6. Venkatesh SB, Kamath V, Hasbullah NB, Binti Abdul Mutalib NSS, Bin Mohamad Nazeri MS, et al. A Preliminary study of tongue prints for Biometric Authentication. Shiraz E- Med J. 2019;20:e96173
7. Sreepradha C, Vaishali MR, David MP. Tongue Replica for Personal Identification: A Digital Photographic Study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2019;31:57-61.
8. Kaul B, Vaid V, Gupta S, Kaul S. Forensic Odontological Parameters as Biometric Tool: A Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14:416-9.
9. Beghini M, Pereira TL, Montes JMC, De Moura DV, Dezem TU, Silva RHA da et al. Morphometric Analysis of Tongue in Individuals of European and African Ancestry. J Forensic Investigation. 2017;5:1-5.
10. Nimbulkar G, Patil R, Nathani S, Salve S, Chhabra KG, Reche SDA. Tongue prints: a forensic review. Indian J Med Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14:6802-6.
11. Garg K, Sachdev R, Shwetam S, Saxena S, Mehrotra V, Srivastava A. Evaluation of morphological characteristic and varieties of tongue prints for personal identification in Kanpur communities: An impression-based analysis. St Int Dent J. 2020;4:54-9.
12. Stefanescu CL, Popa MF, Candea LS. Preliminary study on the tongue-based forensic identification. Rom J Leg Med. 2014;22:263-6.
13. Bejdová Š, Krajíček V, Velemínská J, Horák M, Velemínský P. Changes in the sexual dimorphism of the human mandible during the last 1200 years in Central Europe. Homo. 2013;64:437-53.
14. Pokharel M, Shrestha SL. Cephalometric evaluation of Brahmins of Kathmandu, Nepal based on Jarabak’s analysis. J. Kathmandu Med Coll. 2019;8:13-9.
15. Astekar M. Lingual Morphology: A Secure Method for Forensic Identification. J Forensic Sci Criminal Inves. 2018;9:1-6.
16. Siddiqua A, Abubaker P, Saraswati F, Thakur N. Bifid tongue: differential diagnosis and a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2015;27:686-9.
17. Mathew A, Cherian S, Daniel M, Abraham T, Mathew R. Prevalence of fissured tongue in a South Indian population-A cross-sectional study. J Oral Med. 2017;1:9.
18. Surendra L, Haragannavar VC, Rao RS, Sowmya SV, Augustine D. Visualization of Tongue Morphology: An Emerging Mode of Personal Identification. World J Dent. 2020;11:501-5.
19. Vijay P, Sharma S, Chandra S, Pardhe N, Singh P, Srivastava Y. A Study on Evaluation of Various Tongue Patterns in North Indian Population and a Working Classification System for These Tongue Print Patterns. Int Healthc Res J. 2019;3:76-9
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike License 4.0. This licence allows users to download and share, remix, tweak and build upon the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the original authorship is acknowledged and the new creations are licensed under identical terms.