Evaluation of an Undergraduate Oral Surgery Curriculum – A Pilot Study

Main Article Content

Olufemi Kolawole Ogundipe
Lianne Keiller
Olawumi Adedoyin Fatusi

Keywords

Curriculum alignment, Curriculum renewal, Dental Education

Abstract

Background: Following curricular revisions at the Faculty of Dentistry of the Obafemi Awolowo University, no formal evaluation of its alignment and implementation has been carried out. This study aimed to evaluate the alignment of an Oral surgery curriculum and to determine students’ learning experiences and perceptions of the curriculum.


Methodology: This was a mixed-method study conducted at Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. This ethically approved study adopted a mixed-method descriptive approach to data collection and analysis. Data collection followed a sequential, phased approach comprising document analysis, curriculum mapping, questionnaire survey, and focus group discussions. Quantitative data collected via questionnaires were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data from focus group discussions were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis by the researchers to generate relevant themes.


Results: The curriculum data reveal that the oral surgery course is well-aligned. Furthermore, each course outcome utilizes different methods of assessments and teaching/learning activities (TLAs). Focus group discussions yielded four themes and two sub-themes. The main themes included curriculum alignment, implemented teaching and learning activities, feedback, and curriculum renewal, while the subthemes were recommended TLAs and student learning experiences.


Conclusions: The curriculum evaluation identified strengths of the course as multiple student assessment methods and potential areas for improvement. These improvements included updating the content of the course and including more variety in teaching and learning methods. The authors identified potential learning gaps that require curriculum renewal. Evaluation of the entire program is recommended for comparison.

Abstract 186 | PDF Downloads 68 EPUB Downloads 27 HTML Downloads 3

References

1. Biggs JB, Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university. (4th Edn.). Vol. 50, Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2011. 422–423.

2. Fraser SP, Bosanquet AM. The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? https://doi.org/101080/03075070600680521 [Internet].;31(3):269–84. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075070600680521

3. Fink LD. Creating Significant Learning Experiences : An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003. Available from_https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31776742_Creating_Significant_Learning_Experiences_An_Integrated_Approach_to_Designing_College_Courses_LD_Fink

4. Allen M. Assessing Academic Programs in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Jossey-Bass, editor. 2004 Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Assessing+Academic+Programs+in+Higher+Education-p-9781882982677

5. DyjurP, GrantK, Kalu, F. Introduction to curriculum review. Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning. Calgary: University of Calgary. (2019)Available from https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/sites/default/files/Introduction%20to%20CR%20UPDATED%202019.pdf

6. Dyjur P, Lock J. Three strategies for moving curriculum mapping online. Educ Dev. 2016;2(17):15–9.

7. Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Med Teach [Internet]. 2001 ;23(2):123–37. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11371288/

8. Federal Ministry of Health of Nigeria. Nigeria Undergraduate Medical and Dental Curriculum Template [Internet]. 2012. Available from: https://www.hfgproject.org/nigeria-undergraduate-medical-dental-curriculum-template/.

9 Dyjur, P., & Kalu, F. (2016). Introduction to curriculum review.Retrieved from http://curriculummapping.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/9/0/14908434/introduction_to_curriculum_review.pdf

10. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

11. Chelimsky E, R.Shadish W. Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348896. (1997).

12. Goldie J. AMEE Education Guide no. 29: evaluating educational programmes. Med Teach 2006;28(3):210-24. doi: 10.1080/01421590500271282.

13. Labouta, H. I., Kenny, N. A., Dyjur, P., Li, R., Anikovskiy, M., Reid, L. F., & Cramb, D. T. Investigating the alignment of intended, enacted, and perceived learning outcomes in an authentic research-based science program. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, (2019).10(3). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.3.9462

14. Olasoji HO. Rethinking the Approach to Curriculum Review in Medical and Dental Education in Nigeria. J Educ Pract [Internet]. 2014;5(32):82–7. Available from: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/16718