Knowledge and Perception of Telemedicine among Medical Students of the University of Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria
Main Article Content
Keywords
Telemedicine, Knowledge, Perception, Benefits, Ease of Use, Medical students
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine has promising potential to address the challenges faced by healthcare systems in developing countries, in providing equitable access to quality care. However, the practice of telemedicine is generally poor in these countries. The success of telemedicine like any technology depends on numerous factors including users’ knowledge and perceptions. Hence, this study aimed to examine the knowledge and perceptions of telemedicine among medical students at the University of Jos.
Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study among 305 clinical medical students selected through a stratified sampling technique. A self-administered questionnaire consisting of a 28-item 5-point Likert response scale was used to collect data, comprising 13 items for knowledge, 8 for the perception of benefits, and 7 for the perception of ease of use of telemedicine. Data was analyzed using IBM-SPSS.
Results: One hundred and eleven (36.4%) participants had good knowledge of telemedicine, while 113 (37.1%) had a good perception of the benefits and 103 (33.8%) had a good perception of the ease of use. Respondents with a good knowledge of telemedicine were about five times more likely (OR = 5.24, 95% CI = 3.15 – 8.69) to have a good perception of the benefits and about eight times more likely (OR = 8.33, 95% CI = 4.57 – 14.26) to have a good perception of ease of use.
Conclusions: Few medical students possess desirable levels of knowledge and perceptions of telemedicine which portrays a gap in the medical education curriculum. Therefore, training and educational opportunities are recommended to improve their knowledge and perception of telemedicine.
References
2. Bruhn HK. Telemedicine: dos and don'ts to mitigate liability risk. Journal of AAPOS 2020;24(4):195–6.
3. Smith AC, Thomas E, Snoswell CL, Haydon H, Mehrotra A, Clemensen J, et al. Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). https://doi.org/101177/1357633X20916567 2020;26(5):309–13.
4. Angelico R, Trapani S, Manzia TM, Lombardini L, Tisone G, Cardillo M. The COVID-19 outbreak in Italy: Initial implications for organ transplantation programs. American Journal of Transplantation 2020;20(7):1780.
5. Carter P, Anderson M, Mossialos E, Abel-Smith B. Health system, public health, and economic implications of managing COVID-19 from a cardiovascular perspective. European Heart Journal 2020;41(27):2516–8.
6. Rosenbaum L. The Untold Toll - The Pandemic's Effects on Patients without COVID-19. The New England journal of medicine 2020;382(24):2368–71.
7. Salako O, Okunade K, Allsop M, Habeebu M, Toye M, Oluyede G, et al. Upheaval in cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. eCancer medical science 2020;14.
8. World Health Organization. COVID-19: physical distancing [Internet]. Outbreaks and emergencies2020 [cited 2023 Jul 5]; Available from: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/emergencies/covid-19/information/physical-distancing
9. World Health Organization. WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: 2019.
10. Wade VA, Eliott JA, Hiller JE. Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services. Qualitative health research 2014;24(5):682–94.
11. Green T, Hartley N, Gillespie N. Service Provider's Experiences of Service Separation. http://dx.doi.org/101177/1094670516666674 2016;19(4):477–94.
12. Kitsiou S, Paré G, Jaana M. Effects of home telemonitoring interventions on patients with chronic heart failure: an overview of systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res 2015;17(3):63.
13. Ajala F, Adetunji A, Akande N. Telemedicine Acceptability in South Western Nigeria: Its Prospects and Challenges. International journal of advanced computer technology 2015;4(9):1970–6.
14. Edirippulige S, Armfield NR. Education and training to support the use of clinical telehealth: A review of the literature. Journal of telemedicine and telecare 2017;23(2):273–82.
15. Kampmeijer R, Pavlova M, Tambor M, Golinowska S, Groot W. The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research 2016;16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5).
16. Gray K, Dattakumar A, Maeder A, Henderson KB, Chenery HJ. Advancing Ehealth Education for the Clinical Health Professions: Final Report 2014. Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching; 2014.
17. Ayatollahi H, Sarabi FZP, Langarizadeh M. Clinicians' Knowledge and Perception of Telemedicine Technology. Perspectives in Health Information Management 2015;12(Fall).
18. Edirippulige S, Brooks P, Carati C, Wade VA, Smith AC, Wickramasinghe S, et al. It's important, but not important enough: eHealth as a curriculum priority in medical education in Australia. Journal of telemedicine and telecare 2018;24(10):697–702.
19. Bagot KL, Cadilhac DA, Vu M, Moss K, Bladin CF. Telemedicine in the acute health setting: A disruptive innovation for specialists (an example from stroke). Journal of telemedicine and telecare 2015;21(8):443–8.
20. Adenuga KI, Iahad NA, Miskon S. Towards reinforcing telemedicine adoption amongst clinicians in Nigeria. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017; 104:84–96.
21. Xue Y, Liang H, Mbarika V, Hauser R, Schwager P, Kassa Getahun M. Investigating the resistance to telemedicine in Ethiopia. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2015;84(8):537–47.
22. Bagchi S. Telemedicine in Rural India. PLOS Medicine 2006;3(3): e82.
23. Dasgupta A, Deb S. Telemedicine: A New Horizon in Public Health in India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 2008;33(1):3–8.
24. Becker CD, Dandy K, Gaujean M, Fusaro M, Scurlock C. Legal Perspectives on Telemedicine Part 2: Telemedicine in the Intensive Care Unit and Medicolegal Risk. Perm J 2019;23(18):294.
25. Hobbs Knutson K, Wei MH, Straus JH, Sarvet B, Masek BJ, Stein BD. Medico-legal risk associated with pediatric mental health telephone consultation programs. Adm Policy Ment Health 2014;41(2):215–9.
26. Cottrell MA, Hill AJ, O'Leary SP, Raymer ME, Russell TG. Clinicians' Perspectives of a Novel Home-Based Multidisciplinary Telehealth Service for Patients with Chronic Spinal Pain. International Journal of Telerehabilitation 2018;10(2):81.
27. University of Jos. Unijos at a glance [Internet]. About Unijos2021 [cited 2021 Mar 13]; Available from: https://www.unijos.edu.ng/unijos-at-a-glance
28. Katz D, Elmore J, Wild D, Lucan S. Jekel's Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health. 4th ed. Portland: Elsevier Saunders; 2014.
29. Ghaddaripouri K, Fatemeh S, Baigi M, Abbaszadeh A, Mohammad |, Habibi RM, et al. Attitude, awareness, and knowledge of telemedicine among medical students: A systematic review of cross-sectional studies. Health Science Reports 2023;6(3): e1156.
30. El-Mahalli A, El-Khafif S, Al-Qahtani M. Successes and challenges in the implementation and application of telemedicine in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2012;9(9):1–27.
31. Chen P, Xiao L, Gou Z, Xiang L, Zhang X, Feng P. Telehealth attitudes and use among medical professionals, medical students, and patients in China: A cross-sectional survey. International journal of medical informatics 2017; 108:13–21.
32. Yaghobian S, Ohannessian R, Iampetro T, Riom I, Salles N, de Bustos EM, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of telemedicine education and training of French medical students and residents. 2020;28(4):248–57. https://doi.org/101177/1357633X20926829.
33. Wernhart A, Gahbauer S, Haluza D. eHealth, and telemedicine: Practices and beliefs among healthcare professionals and medical students at a medical university. PLOS ONE 2019;14(2): e0213067.
34. Emikpe BO, Asare DA, Emikpe AO, Folitse RD, Botchway LN. Knowledge and Perception of Veterinary Students in Ghana on Telemedicine. Nigerian Journal of Physiological Sciences 2021;36(1):115–21.
35. Kazmi S, Yasmin F, Siddiqui SA, Shah M, Tariq R, Nauman H, et al. Nationwide Assessment of Knowledge and Perception in Reinforcing Telemedicine in the Age of COVID-19 Among Medical Students from Pakistan. Frontiers in Public Health 2022; 10:845415.
36. Kunwar B, Dhungana A, Aryal B, Gaire A, Adhikari AB, Ojha R. Cross‐sectional study on knowledge and attitude of telemedicine in medical students of Nepal. Health Science Reports 2022;5(2).
37. Davis F, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sciences 1989;35(8):982–1003.
38. Wang WH, Liu YJ. Attitude, Behavioral Intention, and Usage: An Empirical Study of Taiwan Railway's Internet Ticketing System. Int J E-bus Res 2016;12(3):1–16.
39. García-Gutiérrez FM, Pino-Zavaleta F, Romero-Robles MA, Patiño-Villena AF, Jauregui-Cornejo AS, Benites-Bullón A, et al. Self-reported perceptions, and knowledge of telemedicine in medical students and professionals who enrolled in an online course in Peru. BMC Medical Education 2023;23(1):1–8.
40. Aldebasi B, Alhassan AI, Al-Nasser S, Abolfotouh MA. Level of awareness of Saudi medical students of the internet-based health-related information seeking and developing to support health services. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2020;20(1):1–8.
41. Malhotra P, Ramachandran A, Chauhan R, Soni D, Garg N. Assessment of Knowledge, Perception, and Willingness of using Telemedicine among Medical and Allied Healthcare Students Studying in Private Institutions. Telehealth and Medicine Today 2020;1–14.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike License 4.0. This licence allows users to download and share, remix, tweak and build upon the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the original authorship is acknowledged and the new creations are licensed under identical terms.